Authors:

Abstract

This paper explores the conceptual differences between the GICA-Justicia Project initiative and other available models, process performance guidelines, and tools. Comparison was basically carried out through a review of specialized literature, papers, and reports; semi-structured interviews and focus groups with experts in the judicial quality assurance field from different countries; and applying the authors’ experience as technical counterparts in the GICA-Justicia Project (co-authoring a Quality Management Standard and training/auditing during the Quality Management System deployment and accreditation stages).  The paper is meant to unveil how the GICA-Justicia Quality Management Model and the GICA-Justicia Quality Management Standard, as  GICA-Justicia Project by-products, combine to create an innovative process performance approach to quality assurance in judicial environments.

Keywords: GICA-Justicia Quality Management Standard ,   GICA-Justicia Quality Management Model ,   Judiciary Quality Assurance ,   Judicial Process Performance Tool