Lienhard, A., 2010. Caseload Management in the Law Courts: Methodology, Experiences and Results of the first Swiss Study of Administrative and Social Insurance Courts. International Journal for Court Administration, 3(1), pp.30–49. DOI: http://doi.org/10.18352/ijca.52

Lienhard A. Caseload Management in the Law Courts: Methodology, Experiences and Results of the first Swiss Study of Administrative and Social Insurance Courts. International Journal for Court Administration. 2010;3(1):30–49. DOI: http://doi.org/10.18352/ijca.52

Lienhard, A. (2010). Caseload Management in the Law Courts: Methodology, Experiences and Results of the first Swiss Study of Administrative and Social Insurance Courts. International Journal for Court Administration, 3(1), 30–49. DOI: http://doi.org/10.18352/ijca.52

1. Lienhard A. Caseload Management in the Law Courts: Methodology, Experiences and Results of the first Swiss Study of Administrative and Social Insurance Courts. International Journal for Court Administration. 2010;3(1):30-49. DOI: http://doi.org/10.18352/ijca.52

Lienhard A, ‘Caseload Management in the Law Courts: Methodology, Experiences and Results of the First Swiss Study of Administrative and Social Insurance Courts’ (2010) 3 International Journal for Court Administration 30 DOI: http://doi.org/10.18352/ijca.52

Lienhard, Andreas. 2010. “Caseload Management in the Law Courts: Methodology, Experiences and Results of the First Swiss Study of Administrative and Social Insurance Courts”. International Journal for Court Administration 3 (1): 30–49. DOI: http://doi.org/10.18352/ijca.52

Lienhard, Andreas. “Caseload Management in the Law Courts: Methodology, Experiences and Results of the First Swiss Study of Administrative and Social Insurance Courts”. International Journal for Court Administration 3, no. 1 (2010): 30–49. DOI: http://doi.org/10.18352/ijca.52

Lienhard, A. “Caseload Management in the Law Courts: Methodology, Experiences and Results of the first Swiss Study of Administrative and Social Insurance Courts”. International Journal for Court Administration, vol. 3, no. 1, 2010, pp. 30–49. DOI: http://doi.org/10.18352/ijca.52